While media personality Russell Brand is not the first person to be targeted and isolated for being guilty of lifting a variety of lids concerning global corruption and conspiracy, his name may well be forever remembered as the time the world was unequivocally alerted to the power wielded by the Establishment to act in essence illegally against anyone they deem a growing threat to their evil equilibrium.

Regardless of what one thinks about Brand the man or even his past, he is undeniably correct in exposing the myriad deceptions engulfing our civilisation. While this writer personally finds Russell Brand arrogant, condescending, irritating and difficult to maintain concentration past a certain point due to his manic machine gun fire delivery; what has been heard from him kindles passive agreement and support in his endeavours to disseminate a needed warning to a wider audience. In Brand’s case it is perhaps one of shoot the messenger but not his message. He certainly is a firebrand, as in ‘a person who kindles strife or encourages unrest.’

The fact that his videos resonated with 6.6 million YouTube subscribers is testament to the fact that Russell Brand might just be onto something and there are enough people in accord to make the Establishment wary. Just who is the Establishment? They have been called many names in recent decades such as: Big Brother by George Orwell; the Combine by Ken Kesey in One flew over the cuckoos nest; the Machine by Pink Floyd; the Shop by Stephen King; presently the generic, powers that be, or the Global Elite; and more specifically, groups such as the Illuminati and Freemasonry.

The purpose here is not to detail these groups, though the aim is to address the two mentioned above in a subsequent article: The Establishment: Who are they… What do they want? The diagram below provides as good a representation as any of the global hierarchy that sits astride the world. 

Government and its leaders are mere front men and women for those hidden rulers in the shadows who – like Metallica’s Master of Puppets – secretly or not so secretly pull the strings which control and influence money, finance, debt, energy, politics, government, war, munitions, pharmaceuticals, medicine, health and the media. Do not be deceived, the New World Order has been with us for centuries. What is of far greater concern is the fact that the noose being drawn around the collective necks of every human is growing tighter as the One World Government behind the scenes grows steadily stronger.

One would have to admit that the allegations against Brand do not look good.

Refer: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66838794

While all may not be true and the time taken and the manner with which the evidence has been gathered and then released is highly questionable of an organised, premeditated attack; a pattern of behaviour is clearly exposed which does not do Brand’s case any favours. Of course, this is by the bye for the real issue at hand is not Russell Brand himself but the one of his trial by media. 

How can this be ethically, morally or legally acceptable? Granted one could argue it is likened to an offence of misconduct at work and an employee being suspended until an investigation is carried out and a decision on guilt reached. Yet, Brand is not an employee for Channel Four who produced the Despatches documentary. Nor is he employed by YouTube, but rather a user of their service. Is not one innocent until proven guilty rather than the other way around? The first is civilised and democratic the second is barbaric and totalitarian. 

It should not be a surprise to entertain the premise that YouTube, owned since 2006 by Google – one of the evil empires and a cohort of Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft – should in a coordinated effort stop Russell Brand’s revenue stream on no evidence but supposition. Convenient, effective, swift and highly unethical without a due process of law. While Brand may claim justice and even be vindicated in any libel action against YouTube, the damage is done and his presence on that platform again unlikely. 

These appalling precedents have occurred with others who have spoken out about questionable medical practices for instance, but now we have a well known media figure making the public aware of compromise on legitimate issues even if at times sensationalised, being censored for no other reason than he is too close to the bone and interfering with the Establishment’s agenda of influence and control. 

Who knows how small a window is left for anyone to be able to maintain their right of freedom of speech on the internet. Does one really have the freedom to articulate their opinions and ideas anyway? Judging by those people who have been discredited for speaking out about serious issues such as Andrew Wakefield in 2010, this right has already begun to disintegrate. When will complete censorship end the liberty of being able to disseminate information or evidence which does not align with the Establishment’s views and policies? Perhaps we have until 2030 before a total clamp down on the world-wide web is enforced on what can and cannot be said; or that may be too optimistic a date considering the current obsession with politically correct policies.

Anyone bold enough to go against the Establishment remains insignificant until viewing figures and number of followers reaches a point where they are no longer held as such but rather a nuisance. Go beyond that point as Russell Brand has and their presence is then perceived as disruptive. The resulting tactic, is besmirch said person’s character with either real or falsified misconduct. This may or may not result in a prison sentence at worst or a retaliatory legal war at best. If all else fails, then pressure to stop can be exerted in other ways. Worst case scenario if an agitator will not cooperate in becoming silent, is to silence them… permanently.  

© Orion Gold 2023 – All rights reserved. Permission to copy, use or distribute, if acknowledgement of the original authorship is attributed to orion-gold.com